From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jul 28 12:50:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from dt011n65.san.rr.com (dt011n65.san.rr.com [204.210.13.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE2D15072; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by dt011n65.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12553; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:49:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:49:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug X-Sender: doug@dt011n65.san.rr.com To: green@FreeBSD.org Cc: howardjp@byzantine.student.umd.edu, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/11121: w(1) cannot handle more than one user on command line In-Reply-To: <199907281930.MAA19500@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 green@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: w(1) cannot handle more than one user on command line > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: green > State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 28 12:29:49 PDT 1999 > State-Changed-Why: > This has been implemented by me (sorry, yours wasn't very clean) and > committed in -CURRENT. I thought that current best practice was to not close the PR until it had been MFC'ed? Did that change sometime in the last 6 months or so? If so I apologize, but if not, it would be nice if we returned to that practice. Thanks, Doug -- On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter what it does. -- Will Rogers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message