From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon Sep 9 20:15:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D1EDF6DA for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Rztx57XZz4Zqj for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AE4F2DF6D6; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE12FDF6D4 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Rztx48v8z4Zqf for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7381D1AF39 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x89KFrob039943 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x89KFrbX039942 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 20:15:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220440] mount_smbfs fails to mount samba 4.6.5 share Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:15:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sean@rogue-research.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:15:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220440 Sean McBride changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sean@rogue-research.com --- Comment #2 from Sean McBride --- NTLMv1 is quite insecure, and samba sensibly disables it by default, so enabling it on your server is not advisable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NT_LAN_Manager#Weakness_and_Vulnerabilities If I'm not mistaken, the root of your issue is that FreeBSD's mount_smbfs supports only SMB1 and no newer version of the protocol. At least so says a FreeNAS programmer: https://www.ixsystems.com/community/threads/mount_smbfs-vs-encoding.70250/#= post-524802 I can't find any other ticket here in bugzilla that amounts to "mount_smbfs should support newer than SMB1". This ticket seems closest. Perhaps this = bug should be re-titled? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=