From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 19:40:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4994816A4CE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:40:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA56B43D1D; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:40:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0AJeroa043180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:40:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:41:00 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050110144100.4163763f@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <41E2D5C5.3040900@elischer.org> References: <20050110103332.7dbc2f72@mobile.pittgoth.com> <41E2D5C5.3040900@elischer.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Tom Rhodes cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing rtld-aout X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:40:59 -0000 On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:21:41 -0800 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Tom Rhodes wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Would anyone care if I removed rtld-aout in CURRENT and eventually > >in RELENG_5? It was unhooked over two years ago during the removal > >of a.out support by peter. Reviewing the Makefile, it doesn't seem > >to be built for any architecture. Patch URL is listed below but it > >review shouldn't be needed. > > > >Comments? Yes/no/Tom go away? > > > > does this stop me from running 2.2.1 or 1.1.5 binraies? > (probably not but..) No, as has already been pointed out: The code for this utility is broken on CURRENT + 5.3; See src/lib/compat/compat22/ or the misc/compat22 port. :) -- Tom Rhodes