From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Jun 2 15:05:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08A8F72396 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 15:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F216862A8 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 15:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w52F5pcw068252 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jun 2018 08:05:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w52F5ooI068251; Sat, 2 Jun 2018 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 08:05:50 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Erich Dollansky Cc: Ronald Klop , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: panic: Assertion td->td_lock == TDQ_LOCKPTR(tdq) failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2137 Message-ID: <20180602150549.GA68197@www.zefox.net> References: <20180601154153.GA62632@www.zefox.net> <20180602091606.63a1ab37.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180602091606.63a1ab37.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 15:05:40 -0000 On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 09:16:06AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:41:54 -0700 > bob prohaska wrote: > > > As a matter of curiosity, have you been able to run a -j4 buildworld > > to completion on your RPI3? If so, please post your setup. For several > > months now all my attempts at j4 buildworld have failed with "killed, > > out of swap" even though top seems to report minimal swap usage. It > > since I have a small swap partition in RAM, I did not get this message. > I back the memory disk with a file via NFS. Not the speed daemon but it > works. > That is most curious. How much actual swap is available? My RPI3 is killing jobs with "out of swap" despite 4 GB in three physical partitions, one on USB flash and two on the microSD card. Both storage devices are of the same type (SanDisk Extreme) and have similar write speeds, likely better than NFS via the usb-ethernet adapter. Thanks very much! bob prohaska