From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 12 15:26:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from boris.netgate.net (boris2.netgate.net [204.145.147.155]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50D03F7D for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (wellsian@localhost) by boris.netgate.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16690; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:23:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wellsian@caffeine.com) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:23:33 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Wells X-Sender: wellsian@boris.netgate.net To: James Wyatt Cc: Gene Harris , "David A. Gobeille" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DSL firewall and DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Great. Thanks to James and Leif for clearing this up. On my way to pick up the bind book. :) Thanks again. TA, Dave On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, James Wyatt wrote: > Subject: Re: DSL firewall and DNS > > You aren't misrepresenting anything... You are listing the server folks > should use most often (primary choice, not DNS master) and what to fall > back on if it's too slow (dead = really too slow). Think of it as three > nameservers, the most reachable two of which are listed. Now if someone > asks you under oath who is master and slave, you should be careful - Jy@ > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, wellsian wrote: > > This is exactly what I've wanted to do for a couple installations, but I > > haven't felt secure about misrepresenting the primary/secondary > > relationship. Are there any technical reasons not to do what James > > suggests? k To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message