Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:18:20 +0100
From:      Benny Prijono <seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL
Message-ID:  <3AC3280C.565615B0@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>
References:  <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> <20010328010123.A40915@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> <20010328121539.A83100@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC24E25.9207EDF6@ludd.luth.se> <3AC31B36.CE395CF1@jak.nl> <3AC3235A.2522147D@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Benny Prijono wrote:
> 
> As far as I notice (I only briefly browse the web version though), the
> difference between the printed and the online version is, the printed
> version has nice summary table of conformance level test results, 

oops...
second browse to the URL reveals that the results summary is also
there:
http://www.cuj.com/roundup/tables.htm

additional info, Dinkumware has 2,000 individual tests against STL
implementations, Perennial has 74,619 combined tests, while Plum Hall
has 2256 tests. I assume the detail results are in those zip files in
the URL.

cheers,
Bennylp

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AC3280C.565615B0>