From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 14 7:29:53 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D3D37B405; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from madman.nectar.com (madman.nectar.com [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC71710; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:29:44 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id fAEFTih30764; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:29:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:29:44 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Guido van Rooij Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipf Makefile src/sbin/ipfstat Makefile src/sbin/ipmon Makefile src/sbin/ipnat Makefile src/usr.sbin/ipftest Makefile src/usr.sbin/ipresend Makefile src/usr.sbin/ipsend Makefile src/usr.sbin/iptest Makefile Message-ID: <20011114152944.GB30744@madman.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Guido van Rooij , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200111141401.fAEE1ZA62878@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200111141401.fAEE1ZA62878@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 06:01:35AM -0800, Guido van Rooij wrote: > guido 2001/11/14 06:01:35 PST > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > sbin/ipf Makefile > sbin/ipfstat Makefile > sbin/ipmon Makefile > sbin/ipnat Makefile > usr.sbin/ipftest Makefile > usr.sbin/ipresend Makefile > usr.sbin/ipsend Makefile > usr.sbin/iptest Makefile > Log: > Enable IPv6 support for IPF in -stable (just the userland; it already > is enabled in kernel space) Does this actually work? I seem to recall that though ipfilter could process IPv6 rules, that the actual packet filtering didn't work. The end result was that one might load an IPv6 ruleset, and believe that filtering was taking place when in fact it was not. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.com/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@pdc.kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message