Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:04:59 -0400 From: "Richard Bejtlich" <taosecurity@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: 6-stable packages on FTP servers Message-ID: <120ef0530608040404x3ceecf97qe8ff6fd7ac1df94b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I was wondering if someone could comment on the status of package building for 6-stable. A look at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ shows: Build logs (errors and otherwise) Last full run on 6.x-current [i386 ([an error occurred while processing this directive])] Current run on 6.x-current [i386 (2006-07-25 05:29)] Last full run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 (2006-07-28 22:57)] Current run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 (2006-08-04 10:29)] If I take a port like archivers/zip as an example, www.freshports.org/archivers/zip shows the port was upgraded to 2.32 on 7 July 2006. Looking at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-latest-logs/zip-2.31.log.bz2 I see build started at Wed Jun 21 23:20:01 UTC 2006 which might explain why 2.31 is the newest port on the FTP servers: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/zip-2.31.tbz If I look at the "experimental" logs, however, I see 2.32 has been building. pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-exp-latest-logs/zip-2.32.log shows: building zip-2.32 on gohan37.freebsd.org ... build started at Sat Jul 29 07:51:57 UTC 2006 In fact, I can find the package here: pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-packages-latest/archivers/zip-2.32.tbz If the port is building, why does it not appear on the FTP servers? This is just one concrete example, not a specific problem with one port. Thank you, Richard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?120ef0530608040404x3ceecf97qe8ff6fd7ac1df94b>