From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:26:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86AA16A47B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38A013C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D567C1A4D84; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:04:13 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:06:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080121111755.GA28672@blackbone.openportal.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080121111755.GA28672@blackbone.openportal.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211006.42247.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: sin@openportal.org.ua Subject: Re: Incaccuracy in the Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:26:03 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 06:17:56 am sin@openportal.org.ua wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html > > Quote: > "(for obscure technical reasons, IRQ2 = IRQ 9)" > > Doesn't it seen to you that this sounds like a huge ignorance when stated in > a fundamental document like FreeBSD handbook? If you just want to omit some > unnescessary technical details, maybe, you should rather just say "for > technical reasons" instead? > > P.S. Just for that case if an author of this chapter didn't know why it happens > that way: > > "IRQ 2 - Cascaded signals from IRQs 8-15. A device configured to use IRQ 2 > will actually be using IRQ 9" > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt_request Perhaps s/obscure/obtuse/. It actually is obscure to a lot of folks who aren't intimately familiar with x86 internals. -- John Baldwin