Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:57:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Dino Vliet <dino_vliet@yahoo.com> To: Roger Pate <roger@qxxy.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: uname -a and freebsd-version show different output on my system Message-ID: <925569242.3715715.1483034259010@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <CADTH-oscyHF4sKBxfwGCC4hsN%2BeF=Bxx9AFmpgFV2-EYA3s=Lw@mail.gmail.com> References: <625604110.3705032.1483032042526.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <625604110.3705032.1483032042526@mail.yahoo.com> <CADTH-oscyHF4sKBxfwGCC4hsN%2BeF=Bxx9AFmpgFV2-EYA3s=Lw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Roger Pate <roger@qxxy.com>
To: Dino Vliet <dino_vliet@yahoo.com>; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: uname -a and freebsd-version show different output on my syst=
em
=20
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Dino Vliet via freebsd-questions
<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Dear peeps,I'm running freebsd11 in a virtualbox production machine and s=
omething really bothers me a few months already. I have the idea that freeb=
sd-update is not installing the new kernel as uname-a shows:
> 11.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p2 #0: Mon Oct 24 06:55:27 UTC 2016=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/
> However freebsd-version shows:11.0-RELEASE-p6
The kernel is not updated with every patch level, but freebsd-version
does show the current version:
$ uname -r
10.2-RELEASE-p24
$ freebsd-version -k
10.2-RELEASE-p24
$ freebsd-version
10.2-RELEASE-p28
Was there a kernel update you expected to see between 11.0 p2 and p6?
Hmmm I see, I gues not
So what you say that it's normal behaviour I'm seeing.
Great to know.
Thanks for your fast answer as I was worried.
=20
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 29 18:47:02 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0281AC9648E
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:47:02 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com)
Received: from forward3j.cmail.yandex.net (forward3j.cmail.yandex.net
[IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1630::16])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CB31955
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:47:01 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com)
Received: from smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (smtp1m.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.132])
by forward3j.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9003820D76;
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 21:46:58 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A80CC63C0A74;
Thu, 29 Dec 2016 21:46:57 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id
x46tVHoyM2-ktXCju6g; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 21:46:56 +0300
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client certificate not present)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail;
t=1483037217; bh=kLZm5LPTaYnnD6C/Q/A/gJOVkI3n8onpBGy6EBrcowA=;
h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
b=qVwzl6MTxTujQrWSJV5qJ02rn60/ImJGlEtQkGXQj139KgH6Xtq7x2NvE36iXg2XZ
yMWSWKZt2UVXCZHdnEe2ghE4tzfjv91ZSS/GqJJcvKW+3ua0cRwjqwe0udM/iAt/nf
zVdUaLPImd0eUm8dt22f1D5kwFBVc/R+1B79n7hY=
Authentication-Results: smtp1m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com
X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0,1 0
Message-ID: <1483037213.96235.1.camel@yandex.com>
Subject: Re: swap partition
From: Stari Karp <starikarp@yandex.com>
To: "Brandon J.Wandersee" <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 13:46:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <86y3yyzl6q.fsf@WorkBox.homestead.org>
References: <20161229162919.34694.qmail@ary.lan>
<1483032642.96075.3.camel@yandex.com>
<86y3yyzl6q.fsf@WorkBox.homestead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:47:02 -0000
On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 11:42 -0600, Brandon J.Wandersee wrote:
> Stari Karp writes:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 16:29 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <1483012420.95172.9.camel@yandex.com> you write:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I like to increase swap partition ...
> > > Why?Most BSD systems hardly use swap space at all.There's plenty
> > > of paging but that's mostly from the files that back the memory.
> > >
> > > R's,
> > > John
> > I am using Synth and I have 8 GB memory and swap partition was made
> > defaut 3.6 GB and when I built LibreOFFice and Firefox for example
> > together than going swap to 100%
> > (swap_pager: out of swap space
> > kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(5): failed)
> > and because that I think to increase swap partition.
> Building each of those ports individually or temporarily disabling
> the
> use of tmpfs with `synth configure` would make a whole lot more sense
> than creating a new or larger swap partition that you'll never use
> again.
>
> Yes, Synth builds will fail if you try and build several large
> packages
> at once and run out of temporary space in RAM. The same thing happens
> with Poudriere. But once you've completely built a repository for the
> first time you're unlikely to run into that problem again, since the
> large ports that caused the failure in the first place will probably
> not
> be built simultaneously again.
>
I agree because I do not have so many problems anymore :).
Thank you very much to everyone for the help.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?925569242.3715715.1483034259010>