From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue May 15 13:23: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from local.localhost (ool-18be50b9.dyn.optonline.net [24.190.80.185]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898937B422; Tue, 15 May 2001 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kulua@reefedge.com) Received: from localhost (kulua@localhost) by local.localhost (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4FKFjP06506; Tue, 15 May 2001 15:15:45 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: local.localhost: kulua owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:15:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "M. Osten" X-Sender: kulua@local.localhost To: "David O'Brien" Cc: "Michael A. Smith" , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 500au In-Reply-To: <20010514124701.A2926@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > That is NOT true. EVERY `a' model I've seen has a Qlogic 1040 SCSI > controller in it. I am willing to bet someone replaced it with the > Adaptec controller you have. The motherboard layouts are the same. What > do you think is different about them? Or are you comparing the MX5 > models with the GL models? I do know that the `a' models have ATAPI > CDROM drives vs. the SCSI ones of the `au' models. I believe there are > also video differences between the two models. Hum...the older PWS had adaptec controllers...hence no srm. I have a "au" (shipped with NT) and have a IDE cdrom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message