From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 21:47:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2052F106564A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0418FC0A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id RCG57001; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:01 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 72FEA4500E; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:01 -0700 (PDT) To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 EDT." <200807101403.m6AE3OIl095039@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1215812821_18298P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:47:01 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20080711214701.72FEA4500E@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Edwin Groothuis , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:47:03 -0000 --==_Exmh_1215812821_18298P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT) > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > > OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port; > > > anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although > > > it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows). > > > > You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to > > overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the > > extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the > > base one yourself. > > > Shouldn't you also add : > > NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND > > into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered? Or, for V7, add : WITHOUT_BIND=1 to /etc/src.conf. And this assumes that you will be re-building the system before the base system is patched. Note that this will also cause mergemaster to ask about deleting /etc/rc.d/named. Just say 'no'! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1215812821_18298P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFId9TVkn3rs5h7N1ERAiK3AJ9+lONqjpYxETMJLUrwLTbOcs/tdQCdG62P EzscRAULTgkT83NsyA2hKuE= =q6kd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1215812821_18298P--