Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 16:19:19 -0800 From: Jason Fesler <jfesler@calweb.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Install to second hard-drive... Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970223161919.00714898@pop.calweb.com> In-Reply-To: <15468.856741804@time.cdrom.com> References: <Your message of "Sun, 23 Feb 1997 15:49:08 %2B0100." <Mutt.19970223154908.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 03:50 PM 2/23/97 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> UTSL. >> >> BootEasy is only prepared to handle two disks. However, it's also >> buggy in that it thinks that anything other than two disks must mean >> `one disk': > >Doesn't do me a lot of good - I don't have a DOS development environment >for recompiling it. :-) I'm stepping into this a bit late into the game, sorry ;-). How complex is it? I _do_ have DOS and OS2 here; I can use either Watcom or EMX (gcc). Nearly anything gcc'able, is emx'able (indeed: I run a lot of unix->os2 ported material thanks to emx). EMX is not very friendly to Windows users without the "rsx" extender instead of the EMX standard dll/exe extender. Watcom, on the other hand, has a decent 16 bit and a decent 32 bit system, that is perfectly windows happy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.19970223161919.00714898>