From owner-freebsd-current  Fri May  9 10:57:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19933
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pluto.plutotech.com (root@pluto100.plutotech.com [206.168.67.137])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19928
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 9 May 1997 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by pluto.plutotech.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA23936; Fri, 9 May 1997 11:57:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199705091757.LAA23936@pluto.plutotech.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, j@uriah.heep.sax.de
Subject: Re: Problems using remote gdb 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 1997 20:54:59 +1000."
             <199705091054.UAA01919@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 12:56:02 -0600
From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>the machine that now (apparently) requires some flags to sio0 (or
>>whatever has been chosen), so my question: which flags?  According to
>>Justin, 0x40.
>
>Nope.  0x10.  See LINT.

But 0x10 is a no-op according to sio.c without using 0x40 too.

>Bruce

--
Justin T. Gibbs
===========================================
  FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations
===========================================