From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 8 17:50:04 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA19925 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 17:50:04 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA19919 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 17:50:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA00462; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 17:49:32 -0700 To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." cc: Warner Losh , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Non-Intel Hardware and FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Sep 1995 18:36:50 PDT." <199509090136.SAA00497@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1995 17:49:32 -0700 Message-ID: <460.810607772@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Not sure if this applicable however on comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc > there was an interesting thread of netbsd slugging it out with > Linus. The center topic was linux and netbsd on different platforms. Neither applicable nor even very interesting (I read it). This was just another noise fest between NetBSD proponents slagging off Linux for its cross-platform source tree structure and Linus defending it. Linux has simply done things differently and if anyone thinks that there is One True Way of organizing source code then the only likely truth is that they just left college and haven't been in this business very long.. :-) Jordan