Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 05:25:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201297] [REVIVE PORT] security/chkrootkit: Update to 0.50, now builds with wtmpx on FreeBSD 10.1, code included Message-ID: <bug-201297-13-WkMYrXqsuU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201297 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback+ |maintainer-feedback?(lacey. | |leanne@gmail.com) --- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thanks Lacey, and its my pleasure. If the patches for FreeBSD 9.x *cant* be used for any other version, then you'll want to conditionally patch them using an OSVERSION check or similar. If those patches can be used unconditionally, then you can ignore the above comment. Either way, it would be great if you could bundle all attachments here into a single patch that would be great so that its clear to a committer what needs to be done in one step PROTIP: You can create files/patch-* files very easily with the 'makepatch' helper. See the following porters handbook section for instructions: http://www2.au.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#slow-patch If the patches only apply to FreeBSD 9, then you want to use EXTRA_PATCHES construct. See Porters Handbook Section: 5.4.7. PATCHFILES Don't forget to run poudriere/portlint again just to make sure, and obsolete the first 3 patches after you attach the latest version :) Keep up the great work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201297-13-WkMYrXqsuU>