From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 00:35:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C9F16A4CF for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:35:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA7043D60 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01ABC15C95 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 81.84.175.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:32:47 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <52732.81.84.175.12.1091395967.squirrel@81.84.175.12> In-Reply-To: <20040801230923.65116.qmail@web61309.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040801230923.65116.qmail@web61309.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:32:47 -0000 (GMT) From: "Hugo Silva" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1 kernel w/ SMP under high load = panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:35:11 -0000 Damn. And any clue on the magic kernel option that stopped the panics? Perhaps it wasn't *that* magic and just decreased the odds of a panic hapenning under high load, but that would do for me. I just lost the server 10 minutes ago doing a portupgrade -a with 4 jails running. :x Regards, Hugo > it was said: > >>4.10 won't work with the current hardware on the >>server, and I wanted to >>try 5.2.1 because of the improved SMP. >> >>I know there is a solution for this by adding a >>kernel option, but i'm >>completely CLUELESS. >> >>Can anyone give a hint? >> >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On Sunday 01 August 2004 15:08, Hugo Silva wrote: >>>> I am running a Dual Xeon 2.8ghz w/ SMP, SCHED_ULE >>on FreeBSD >>>> 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9. >>> >>> Why aren't you running FreeBSD 4.10 on a machine >>like that? 5.2.1 is >>> simply >>> NOT ready for production enviroments. Why do you >>think it's still >>> considered >>> as unstable? Your panic is probably being caused by >>a bad driver, but of >>> course I can't tell you which one. >>> >>> So get in touch with your data centre and get 4.10 >>on that machine. It >>> will >>> probably solve most of your problems. >>> >>> Jorn > > Hello, > > I hate to tell you this, but I think your problem may > be worse than you think. On the other hand, its > solution is close: > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/todo.html > > Refer to item 2 under "show stopper defects". > > HTH, > > Stheg > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- www.6s-gaming.com