From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 5 10:15:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8E916A422 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A14CD43D58 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 52913 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2006 10:17:52 -0000 Received: from dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (202.216.232.62) by natial.ongs.co.jp with SMTP; 5 Feb 2006 10:17:52 -0000 Message-ID: <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:15:46 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Daichi GOTO , ota@j.email.ne.jp, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander@Leidinger.net, saturnero@freesbie.org Subject: Re: patchset-7 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:15:50 -0000 >>> I have updated the patches: >>> >>> For 7-current patch >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p5.diff >>> >>> For 6.x patch >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p5.diff >>> >>> Changes from -p4: >>> - fixed around "can't fifo/vnode bypass -1" panic problem >>> - added some comments into source-code for src-developer >>> - edited style as style(9) saye >> -- >> Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi > > so far so good! it's not crashing my diskless. > > thanks, > danny It's good :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi