From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 12 06:14:44 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA09838 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 06:14:44 -0700 Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA09831 ; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 06:14:42 -0700 Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0t3NT6-0003vkC; Thu, 12 Oct 95 06:14 PDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA00480; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 14:14:47 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: sos@freebsd.org cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: MSDOSfs long filename support.... In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Oct 1995 04:36:41 MST." <199510121136.EAA01458@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 14:14:46 +0100 Message-ID: <478.813503686@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > While fumbling along with WIN95 (yuck) here at work it hit me that > WIN95 is able to put long filenames onto a MSDOS FAT filesystem. > > They way they do it is easy, and I'm thinking of putting support > into our msdos filesystem driver. > > Would this bring us closer to running of a msdos filesystem ?? > (modulo unstabilities in the msdosfs support). > It should be possible to load the files under dos with a > special utility (or WIN95) and then run FreeBSD off of that > directory right?? yes, when devfs is all swingin' -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. It will be some time yet before progress goes too far... (Poul Henningsen)