From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 09:03:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587A516A469 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F4113C448 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.246.248]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l569INjO061026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:18:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l56937dj049020; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:03:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <46667847.2010700@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:03:03 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <5fbf03c20706050031p6f25d02cyae7a91593e40171a@mail.gmail.com> <20070605082244.GB22215@com.bat.ru> <46652DEF.1070709@netfence.it> <20070605124644.GD22215@com.bat.ru> <4665E9A1.2030402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4665E9A1.2030402@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: [net/samba3] Upgrade to Samba 3.0.25a X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:03:32 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > >> Unfortunately, Samba3 became so big and hairy, that fixing one problem >> there creates few new. So, for the last ~10 releases this was pretty >> common situation when erratra release was following very quickly. > > I think it's very reasonable, and well in keeping with FreeBSD > tradition, to delay upgrading to a new release of ported software > until the maintainer is convinced that it's safe to do so. Generally speaking I agree, but when it happens, like it did in this case, that a new version is committed which has severe bugs and is immediately superceded by a corrected one, I think it's good to move to it. bye & Thanks av.