From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul  6 16:50:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA11988
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA11982;
          Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA03258;
	Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd003254; Sun Jul  6 23:43:21 1997
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com
cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@FreeBSD.ORG>, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kern/3446
In-Reply-To: <199707062239.PAA26655@quack.kfu.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970706163918.2904A-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Sun, 6 Jul 1997 nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote:

> Bill Fenner writes:
> 
> > Synopsis: IPFIREWALL reject returns port unreachable, not host
> 
> > State-Changed-Why: 
> > Turns out this is yet another duplicate, for kern/3452.
> > I missed that one because it's closed.
> 
> I must protest in the strongest possible terms the closure without
> action of this PR.
There was action 
the entire IPFW code has been changed so that
you may now select the way in which you reject  a packet..
please check out the new version of ipfw in both 2.2 and 3.0

let me know it this does not solve the problem for you.

julian