From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Feb 8 17:30:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7126737B4EC for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:30:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f191U3451955; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:30:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200102090130.f191U3451955@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Garrett Wollman Subject: kern/24959: proper TCP_NOPUSH/TCP_CORK compatibility Reply-To: Garrett Wollman Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/24959; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Garrett Wollman To: Tony Finch Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: kern/24959: proper TCP_NOPUSH/TCP_CORK compatibility Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:27:10 -0500 (EST) < said: > * TCP_NOPUSH has additional T/TCP-related semantics that may be > undesirable in an application that only wants the TCP_CORK > semantics. If the option is set on a listening socket then it > enables TAO. I don't believe this is material, since Transaction TCP is disabled by default. Furthermore, I would prefer to avoid introducing such a poorly-named option. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message