From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 23:13:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727BAEA20D6 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic303-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic303-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D91D7E777 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: WvpmtfoVM1lKUJ.vaaNs6xh7lM6w7Fzy7Bnw0Hnf0MeNegY8Qb.gP6q4UUp3Vak vxkCNPt.Q0fA0sEltQokeEd0RAxCZwVXiUxk4GffqWpfoIrQMhytBmKKLHQ5RkGmMW2BRGevzs70 UF8yP.QBhJd2R.1DHgFBSsVIK9WauujneL7eYV7JW2IQdomCti05A_b8up3.f9kDG486OeE10nRM f0Y3tDttnq7F6bm9r1C6Br4xvT69aRZ2jSxavuBEu_HCQA19wF9HBqj0g9ZvbMRXHRTSRWnAagUU bmP2ZzBokYFP4Mpd7FBnbChkRe7LrFIR9tXO4GqSlwRJDwEv3ulYGA1cEAfcW1MZQz8AaPcQEtyo jXQ32WaloztbLVX0d9992mcy9aT.B7zGzVNNCvo4fVovYEPIi6rGBLSjxOwd_AV29wpXEAM8ZjQh _AqrLZSxXPwX6PdWQwFSgRXvHROCb8fVfwFkP7R4C7kkUAR3BAveLyPJwavbIDLXbkVe7lrJUqhN UprU- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:13:13 +0000 Received: from smtpgate102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (EHLO [192.168.0.209]) ([10.214.153.45]) by smtp414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID -1397451363 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Boot issue after upgrade To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8706ecd1205493e8db739db69303c37c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> From: Paul Pathiakis Message-ID: <6f0519e3-48b8-268d-f8c5-56283b63c673@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:52:55 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8706ecd1205493e8db739db69303c37c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:13:14 -0000 Then, I, most humbly, apologize. It seems that CentOS seems to have the same old dependency issues with it's packages that have plagued it. If I go and install the epel and load packages, I still, occasionally, get dependency issues and conflicts on CentOS I don't get those when using RH proper. Of course, most of the packages seem to come down from RH repos. As I said, I've been working with both for the last 10 years along with SuSe, Debian, Ubuntu, etc, etc. Thank you for the correction. P. On 12/11/2017 11:12, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Sun, December 10, 2017 22:00, Paul Pathiakis wrote: > >> Yes, CentOS compiles from RH, however, all the most recent ported >> utilities come from cutting edge, not from RH. It leads to >> instability. RH stays with stuff that has stabilized and had the >> bugs shaken out. They leave all of that to CentOS and Fedora before >> incorporating to RH. >> > That statement is false. If you doubt me then send your claim as made > above to Johnny Hughes and let us know what > response you get. > > We are moving away from CentOS to FreeBSD. But that has to do with > RedHat's desire to become the Linux incarnation of Microsoft and has > nothing to do with the integrity of the CentOS team. CentOS is a > binary reproduction of the corresponding RHEL release; saving only the > copyright and trademark removals. >