From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 00:59:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24B716A400 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=bcxfYO=IQ=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout18.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout18.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AADB13C44C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=bcxfYO=IQ=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan34.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.34] helo=mailscan34.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout18.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1HQYdd-0008M5-GO for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:43:45 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] ident=exim) by mailscan34.yourhostingaccount.com with spamscanlookuphost (Exim) id 1HQYdc-0004SG-9v for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:43:44 -0400 Received: from authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.11] helo=authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan34.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1HQYdZ-0004RO-L6; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:43:41 -0400 Received: from cpe-71-72-98-197.columbus.res.rr.com ([71.72.98.197] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1HQYdX-0007Fm-8d; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:43:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:43:26 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20070311194326.4da9e341@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <20070310223906.E8914@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <6faf55220703100845u62eab431y3a16ae0d8cb3bba7@mail.gmail.com> <55D533EB-26F9-40B7-838B-8BCB9D0A9463@tca-cable-connector.com> <20070310223906.E8914@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: Vulpes Velox X-EN-OrigIP: 71.72.98.197 X-EN-OrigHost: cpe-71-72-98-197.columbus.res.rr.com Cc: David Schulz , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Howmany CPU Does FreeBSD Support ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:59:10 -0000 On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:40:47 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > I have heard it does not scale well above 4 > > to be clear. > > kernel task (disk I/O, network etc.) is always on first processor, > everything else on any CPU. > > so as long as disk I/O network and other kernel tasks are able to > fit on one processor that's OK. > > for machines doing mostly pure computing 8-16 CPU may work fine, > for machines doing mostly fileserving and routing even 2 CPUs may > be not well utilized That is only true if the process is giant locked. When look at dmesg, look for things that say GIANT-LOCKED and those will be ones confined to one processor. There has been a massive push since 5 to get ride of those.