From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Mar 16 8:39:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41A337B405 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 08:35:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id EAFD85347; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:35:03 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Bruce Evans , "M. Warner Losh" , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: caddr_t sweep References: <37367.1016280650@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 16 Mar 2002 17:35:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <37367.1016280650@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > I suspect that DES' patch is pretty much program generated anyway, > so I don't see a value to "polluting" it with manual fixups. I did the rough work with a Perl one-liner, but manual fixups will be required anyway. This is going to take some time, but I wanted the heads-up to go out early. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message