From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 21 18:28:14 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0871C16A46B
	for <current@freeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 18:28:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44C913C4BB
	for <current@freeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 May 2007 18:28:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: (qmail 72083 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 18:27:35 -0000
Received: from 209-128-117-003.bayarea.net (HELO ?10.0.1.144?)
	(nate-mail@209.128.117.3)
	by root.org with ESMTPA; 21 May 2007 18:27:35 -0000
Message-ID: <4651E484.1010204@root.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:27:16 -0700
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070424)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <2792.1179764955@critter.freebsd.dk> <86zm3y9hg5.fsf@dwp.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86zm3y9hg5.fsf@dwp.des.no>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: takawata@freeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>,
	current@freeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: HPET vs other timers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:28:14 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> writes:
>>> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>>>> I can't rememember who raised the quality of it recently, CVS will
>>>> know.  I was sceptical, because I also have systems where HPET is
>>>> slow.
>>> I did, with your approval, almost a year ago.
>> Yes, I said "try it" or something of the sort.
> 
> For the record, I ran with HPET timers the entire time from HPET support
> was first committed until I finally committed that patch - about ten
> months - so I did test it to the best of my ability.
> 
> DES

Let's keep this technical.  I'm fine with bumping HPET to below ACPI
timer if the hw turns out to be this much slower.

Anyone able to speculate why though?  HPET only reads 32 bits from a
memory mapped region.  No locking or other requirements.  ACPI_timer
does multiple IO ops, which according to bde@ are much slower than
memory reads.  So unless something from the chipset is stopping the
processor (SMI?) when it reads from this region, I have a hard time
seeing why it's slower.

-- 
Nate