From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 2 19:15:56 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7E75FD for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1F015CA for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 19:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f11so8884773qae.24 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:15:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zdhb3kmxMQJCG1u2wQr/PyDiejK9tfKCnOaY00KHOvI=; b=FEUtMi51BkS+/5xD1o7/U0jewk2MiopbU0CL4ySJDuBpDz8ojviExz6G9WfdKVFhuG jaXZdfB33LIClNn1qb+0oLbihq4znu9xryis9Nb8gXaXPP4k4Wm2HcRvanxKKs9xTBgd 9bUzeKkV8x5UzNyK8GPHMtR2VoFNqlG1wuTfGmBAkLWmdYaPyGWg7QCYa8mLR7wEqbZi FA+PVUdF3Th46K9mQmfOk0+CxgUm0I4u8LmL0BPx8SahH9Lc8HFtvadC9Ahx2KijYC41 ChEL8IqOb9+hsyGfkcFVkwkiyHsFQuzWrzBdhHizwiFsS1h/vdzSc1UB18IRNRe9Y11v ir7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.213.194 with SMTP id gx2mr50069345qcb.16.1391368555388; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:15:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.151.73 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 11:15:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140202184546.1aa51b6f@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20140131150601.53ee40f4.freebsd@edvax.de> <20140202184546.1aa51b6f@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 20:15:55 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: S3JQHImgjGLfZiqOttPlmJAmKH8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS From: CeDeROM To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 19:15:56 -0000 On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:45 PM, RW wrote: > In FreeBSD 10 the new fuse ntfs is much better than any previous ntfs > support. I use that for multimedia storage these days. So far it's > worked just fine on FreeBSD, Windows and my Samsung TV - I don't have > Linux but I doubt it's any worse. msdosfs may be more mature, but it's > still an accident waiting to happen. Thanks for hint :-) Some years ago fuse was not only crashing the filesystem but also the machine :-P I will give it a try though :-) My focus will go to UDF anyway as this seems to be the most "native" filesystem on many platforms :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info