From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 14 13:58:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ambrisko.com (adsl-64-174-51-42.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.174.51.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE3337B40D; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f8EKwQI75128; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200109142058.f8EKwQI75128@ambrisko.com> Subject: Re: Does boot1 still have a > 1023 cyl limit? In-Reply-To: To: John Baldwin Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Doug Ambrisko , dhw@whistle.com, mark@whistle.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, roam@ringlet.net, msmith@FreeBSD.org, kstewart@urx.com, rnordier@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL92 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin writes: | This is for boot0. Nothing should be touching boot1 flags. | My guess is that someone has somehow mixed an old boot2 with the new boot1 | which is jumping to the wrong place to call xread. The "code" at cs:eip looks | a lot like the BPB in boot1 now. Okay that basically how I read the code. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. Your theory sounds quite possible. Thanks, Doug A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message