From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 8 15:40:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from MEOWVAX.INT.TELE.DK (fw1.inet.tele.dk [193.163.158.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E052E14F06 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 15:40:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from FLUFFEE@FLUFFY.GETS.AN.ANALPROBE.DK) Received: from localhost (FLUFFEE@localhost) by MEOWVAX.INT.TELE.DK (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA03536 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 00:40:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from FLUFFEE@FLUFFY.GETS.AN.ANALPROBE.DK) X-Authentication-Warning: MEOWVAX.INT.TELE.DK: FLUFFEE owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 9 Jan 1900 00:40:45 +0100 (CET) From: USER FLUFFEE X-Sender: FLUFFEE@MEOWVAX.INT.TELE.DK Reply-To: fluffee@netscum.dk To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.4 BSD forever? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: sync; sync; kill 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 8 Jan 19100, remorse code wrote: > Just because other people do silly things with version numbers, doesn't > mean FreeBSD has to. > > Let's not forget, though, that FreeBSD jumped versions from 2.2.2 to > 2.2.5. :) Y'know, when FreeBSD 4.4 has come and gone, and you're into the 5.x releases, I'm gonna have to think about taking down the ole poster with `4.4 > 5.4' on it.... - the un-fluffee (not that that would be a *bad* thing, I just wonder if I can find where said poster is hanging in this mess) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message