Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:39:28 -0700 From: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> To: Gao Long <urgaolong@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <200405262039.28752.david@usermode.org> In-Reply-To: <20040526132333.38694.qmail@web90101.mail.scd.yahoo.com> References: <20040526132333.38694.qmail@web90101.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 06:23 am, Gao Long wrote: > But if someone piled the BSD into a set of RPM > packages , then we can just install a FreeBSD , even use a > grub bootloader , and making RPMs of a base system is not a > hard work. Except that there is absolutely no reason to use RPM! We already have our own package format that does everything RPM does and more. And without several of the disadvantages. Converting Anaconda's Perl scripts to use the pkg tools instead of rpm should be a rather trivial. The major problems are elsewhere. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405262039.28752.david>