Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 04:41:37 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Dom Mitchell <dom@myrddin.demon.co.uk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9 Message-ID: <199805312041.EAA04702@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 21:31:52 %2B0100." <E0ygEll-0000xJ-00.qmail@myrddin.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dom Mitchell wrote: > On 28 May 1998, Peter Wemm proclaimed: > > Dom Mitchell wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be easier to just stick with 8.8.8 until the licensing > > > issues of this latest sendmail can be clarified? > > > > Yes, that's pretty much what is happening by default. I have asked the > > sendmail people twice now about this and still have got no response. I > > might try sending by fax next. I find it quite ironic that people setting > > up to sell sendmail don't have a handle on email. > > *sigh* Sadly very often true. I've taken that back. The explanation was far less sinister, they were just out of town for a week and were swamped. This is under way now. > > > P.S. You left out MMDF. :-) > > > > MMDF can go away and die. I've wasted too much of my life fighting MMDF > > (and often loosing).. > > I wholeheartedly agree after a year of working as mailman at Demon > Internet. There are too many fools still out there on the Internet who > think that it's actually a useful mailer. Mind you, it did have > anti-relaying first. :-) Yes, it does the anti-relaying too damn well - that was the problem I always had, I never really got a good handle on getting it to intentionally relay mail... :-] Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805312041.EAA04702>