From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  3 16:47:03 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C7916A468
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2007 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E1B13C468
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2007 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject;
	b=jC40eirDt7LAt3ZAFulYHwRZ5sGeib43lDR6zjhni9VzDHmBRv0Mf1pypGKIwUnT/7+fwAhQ6lal7ytMSM/vqE5QsYqN8hrM8I3IJB0ail/EjLER+ADophuZA6dDiy/MaX9kM8qIm/Nyuim/y+02ySMf7X/OnTxDcsVgnTWQztg=;
Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25])
	by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1I5lWm-0007Py-Iz; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:47:00 +0400
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 20:46:56 +0400
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Message-ID: <20070703164655.GA1707@void.codelabs.ru>
References: <200706160347.33331.max@love2party.net>
	<20070617094126.GT3779@void.codelabs.ru>
	<200706171717.21585.max@love2party.net>
	<20070619074150.GC26920@void.codelabs.ru>
	<4677FF00.4060506@root.org>
	<20070620152609.GD26920@void.codelabs.ru>
	<20070620190423.GH26920@void.codelabs.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070620190423.GH26920@void.codelabs.ru>
Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pf 4.1 Update available for testing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:47:03 -0000

Nate, Max, good day.

Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:04:23PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> This error can potentially be responsible to the weird bandwidth
> values I am having with the altq on my notebook.  The issue is
> described on the thread
>   http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-April/070730.html
> Basically, I am setting one BW limit in pf.conf and seeing another
> one (much lower)  via the ifstat utility.
> 
> I was able only to test the compilation of the new patched kernel.
> No bandwidth tests were done: I have no access to the fast LAN link
> up to the Monday, 24th, sorry.  May be I will be able to setup
> ng_eiface and test with it, but I am not fluent with the netgraph.
> Will post an update if tests will be carried.

At last, carried the tests.  No luck: still seeing weird
bandwidth numbers as compared with the setting in the pf.conf.

But still, the second issue about non-initialized variables
can be committed: it will not harm.  What do you both think?

Thank you.
-- 
Eygene