Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:01:21 -0800 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Superfluous dependencies Message-ID: <20110313000121.GH79028@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20110312235709.GG79028@comcast.net> References: <AANLkTik65O3gbUoVBM-YbjWu0dpq0OuNn2KoUaC5b5ov@mail.gmail.com> <4D76426A.2010006@secnap.com> <AANLkTi=j7fR%2BRm4Fy14Q_KPDyE%2B7%2BO_d3pd3Yaek=kJG@mail.gmail.com> <20110312215307.GB26099@lonesome.com> <20110312221233.GD79028@comcast.net> <4D7C00D5.8070003@FreeBSD.org> <20110312235709.GG79028@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 15:57:09 PST Charlie Kester wrote: >What's really needed are better tools to help maintainers see what >their ports are installing, and for them to exercise more disciple in >asking "Is this really necessary, or should I make it optional? Is it >really a run dependency, or is it only needed for the build?" (*) s/disciple/discipline I need to exercise more proofreading discipline. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110313000121.GH79028>