From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Mon Mar 2 21:13:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D03925AD8F for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48WXvB6JfLz4394; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (static-71-168-218-4.cmdnnj.fios.verizon.net [71.168.218.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jkim/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A8E62F2B5; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src To: Eugene Grosbein , Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <202002272202.01RM20j9030410@repo.freebsd.org> <525c9e77-9b86-ba95-ede5-54f3bbbb1aa7@grosbein.net> <9eb3986d-3726-300d-506f-8051a3a84728@grosbein.net> <66b377d6-cb80-ef9a-c87f-fcb893b9d631@FreeBSD.org> From: Jung-uk Kim Autocrypt: addr=jkim@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFJBztUBCAChqNyGqmFuNo0U7MBzsD+q/G6Cv0l7LGVrOAsgh34M8wIWhD+tztDWMVfn AhxNDd0ceCj2bYOe67sTQxAScEcbt2FfvPOLp9MEXb9qohZj172Gwkk7dnhOhZZKhVGVZKM4 NcsuBDUzgf4f3Vdzj4wg6WlqplnTZo8lPE4hZWvZHoFIyunPTJWenybeV1xnxK7JkUdSvQR0 fA59RfTTECMwTrSEfYGUnxIDBraxJ7Ecs/0hGQ7sljIj8WBvlRDU5fU1xfF35aw56T8POQRq F4E6RVJW3YGuTpSwgtGZOTfygcLRhAiq3dFC3JNLaTVTpM8PjOinJyt9AU6RoITGOKwDABEB AAG0Hkp1bmctdWsgS2ltIDxqa2ltQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnPokBPQQTAQoAJwUCUkHO1QIbAwUJ E0/POwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAAKCRB8n5Ym/NvxRqyzB/wL7QtsIpeGfGIA ZPMtgXMucM3NWzomyQMln2j2efUkDKthzh9jBxgF53TjOr7imwIt0PT2k1bqctPrq5IRqnu9 mGroqaCLE3LG2/E3jEaao4k9PO6efwlioyivUo5NrqIQOQ4k3EAXw7d2y0Dk1VpTgdMrnUAB hj7lGlLqS4ydcrf24DdbCRGdEQwqd9DBeBgbWynxAJMgbZBhYVEyIHuQKkJ8qY0ibIPXXuF0 KYDeH0qUHtWV2K3srNyPtymUkBQD84Pl1GWRYx05XdUHDmnX0JV3lg0BfYJZgZv0ehPQrMfY Fd9abTkf9FHQYz1JtsC8wUuRgqElRd6+YAGf8Tt9uQENBFJBztUBCADLtSrP44El2VoJmH14 OFrlOgxzZnbn+Y/Gf1k12mJBiR+A+pBeRLD50p7AiTrjHRxO3cHcl9Dh0uf1VSbXgp8Or0ye iP/86fZPd4k5HXNmDTLL0HecPE08SCqGZ0W8vllQrokB1QxxRUB+fFMPJyMCjDAZ7P9fFTOS dTw1bJSTtOD8Sx8MpZUa9ti06bXFlVYDlaqSdgk181SSx+ZbSKkQR8CIMARlHwiLsa3Z9q9O EJr20HPyxe0AlTvwvFndH61hg7ds63eRvglwRnNON28VXO/lvKXq7Br/CiiyhFdKfINIx2Z5 htYq22tgGTW7mBURbIKoECFBTX9Lv6BXz6w9ABEBAAGJASUEGAEKAA8FAlJBztUCGwwFCRNP zzsACgkQfJ+WJvzb8UZcJQf+IsTCxUEqY7W/pT84sMg5/QD3s6ufTRncvq14fEOxCNq1Rf4Q 9P+tOFa8GZfKDGB2BFGIrW7uT5mlmKdK1vO6ZIA930y5kUsnCmBUEBJkE2ciSQk01aB/1o62 Q3Gk/F6BwtNY9OXiqF7AcAo+K/BMIaqb26QKeh+IIgK1NN9dQiq3ByTbl4zpGZa6MmsnnRTu mzGKt2nkz7vBzH6+hZp1OzGZikgjjhYWVFoJo1dvf/rv4obs0ZJEqFPQs/1Qa1dbkKBv6odB XJpPH0ssOluTY24d1XxTiKTwmWvHeQkOKRAIfD7VTtF4TesoZYkf7hsh3e3VwXhptSLFnEOi WwYofg== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:13:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 21:13:59 -0000 On 20. 3. 2., Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 02.03.2020 21:29, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >>>> You can easily repeat the problem using recent ports tree and >>>> recent stable/11 and handbook-recommended way. >>> >>> Mixing base and ports OpenSSLs is a bad idea. If you decided to >>> build some ports with ports OpenSSL for some reason, every ports >>> using OpenSSL should be rebuilt with it to avoid this mayhem. >> >> And vice versa, i.e., every port using OpenSSL should be rebuilt if >> you decided to go back to base OpenSSL. > > One more time: these days it is not possible. There are ports that need new 1.1.1 API > and cannot be used with stable/11 using base SSL, there is no choice. > That's why base sendmail needs to use new SSL API too. I don't understand why you insist on patching Sendmail to use new SSL API. Are you trying to build base Sendmail with ports OpenSSL? AFAIK, there is no way to do that. Jung-uk Kim