From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 9 11:37:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D771065692 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08C18FC28 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F0508E7; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:37:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcr1Z7J3eoD5; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:37:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-auth.unixathome.org (smtp-auth.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E81750823 ; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 11:37:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B71490B.6030602@langille.org> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:37:47 -0500 From: Dan Langille User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Sprickman References: <4B6F9A8D.4050907@langille.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: hardware for home use large storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:37:46 -0000 Charles Sprickman wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote: > >> I'm thinking of 8x1TB (or larger) SATA drives. I've found a case[2] >> with hot-swap bays[3], that seems interesting. I haven't looked at >> power supplies, but given that number of drives, I expect something >> beefy with a decent reputation is called for. > > For home use is the hot-swap option really needed? Is anything needed? The option is cheap and convenient. When it comes time to swap disks, you don't have to take the case apart, etc. Yes, it saves downtime, but it is also easier. > Also, it seems like > people who use zfs (or gmirror + gstripe) generally end up buying pricey > hardware raid cards for compatibility reasons. There seem to be no > decent add-on SATA cards that play nice with FreeBSD other than that > weird supermicro card that has to be physically hacked about to fit. They use software RAID and hardware RAID at the same time? I'm not sure what you mean by this. Compatibility with FreeBSD?