Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:41:09 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Cc:        ml-freebsd-stable Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HPN-SSH question
Message-ID:  <A6AFCC97-74FE-4B9E-8B9E-B245909D944E@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <BE96C8EC5CEB4411BAA45D9A5882CDAB@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <9728B37F7A4EBE45A2FD4B18883BAED6D02612@SN2PRD0802MB111.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BE96C8EC5CEB4411BAA45D9A5882CDAB@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14. Jan 2012, at 23:56 , Steven Hartland wrote:

> On a similar note I'm actually quite concerned by the inclusion of
> these patches by default in the OS version of ssh as we've seen
> several cases of it causing noticeable performance degradation
> instead of improvement.
> 
> I've not tested on 9, but this was certainly the case on 8.2.

8.2 did not shipped them so you had installed them yourself?

What kind of performance degradations and in which kind of environment
an how "noticeable"?

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A6AFCC97-74FE-4B9E-8B9E-B245909D944E>