Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:56:02 +0100
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r279030 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6
Message-ID:  <20150223175602.251053a0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <201502192316.t1JNGALg060789@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201502192316.t1JNGALg060789@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Author: glebius
> Date: Thu Feb 19 23:16:10 2015
> New Revision: 279030
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279030
> 
> Log:
>   Now that all users of _WANT_IFADDR are fixed, remove this crutch and
>   hide ifaddr, in_ifaddr and in6_ifaddr under _KERNEL.

There are reports that net-snmp is broken now.  Removal of a userland
interface should get a ports exp-run.

Grepping the ports tree for _WANT_IFADDR brings up these:

devel/libgtop/Makefile:CPPFLAGS+=	-I${LOCALBASE}/include
	-DHAVE_NET_IF_VAR_H -D_WANT_IFADDR
net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile:CFLAGS+=	-D_WANT_IFADDR

Can you have a look at them?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150223175602.251053a0>