From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 14 19:59:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2576716A41C for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:59:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF7443D1D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:59:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AA9222404 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80746-03 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76119222402 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:59:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050614135828.M90456@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20050614135828.M90456@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506141459.20488.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: New Server - To 5.x or Not To 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:59:36 -0000 --nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Is there anyone out there using 5-STABLE and UNIONFS that are happy with > it, or is it still very problematic? This probably isn't the heavy-duty example you wanted, but... I run 5.4-STABLE on a laptop, and mount /usr/ports/distfiles read-only from= =20 another server via smbfs. Then, I use unionfs to=20 mount /usr/ports/localdistfiles above /usr/ports/distfiles. This is hardly= =20 in the same league as running a database or mailserver through unionfs, but= =20 it certainly seems stable enough for my limited needs. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCrzcY5sRg+Y0CpvERApHAAJ9I32Ohpcm5D2+s92i5jCa1gkpC+wCePKuX en6k9YXvj9DaCZ0+OkK21is= =4pwb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1148257.5ZUNMHZEpB--