From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 24 13:07:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18938 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:07:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18931 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:07:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA16995; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:07:07 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199901242107.QAA16995@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Peter Wemm Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New crypt code is not sucessful In-Reply-To: <199901231854.CAA00522@spinner.netplex.com.au> References: <199901231048.MAA37197@greenpeace.grondar.za> <199901231854.CAA00522@spinner.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk < said: > Speaking of rehashing.. I wonder what the chances of having the password > verification stages of login (or PAM) rehashing the passwords on a > successful login would be? The login program used in the Allspice System (4.3+NFS/RVD on uVAXen) would do this if the user's Kerberos password differed from the /etc/passwd password. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message