From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:40:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EEFBC16A4CE; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 9294943D91; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:40:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa56660@salmon>; 14 Jan 2004 13:40:31 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:40:31 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040114134031.GA26587@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200401140747.i0E7lAGP003931@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200401140746.i0E7ka3Q003877@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040114132513.GA71489@madman.celabo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040114132513.GA71489@madman.celabo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/string ffs.c ffsl.c fls.c flsl.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:40:35 -0000

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 07:25:13AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> Please back these out. `>>=' operator is a beautiful standard C
> operator and has nothing to do with GNU.  Whoever claimed it was a GNU
> extension was confused.

I believe the cast was the GNU C bit, rather than the >>= operator.
In the new version the cast isn't applied to an lvalue.

	David.