Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:56:05 GMT From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/26224 Message-ID: <20010424.20560500@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> In-Reply-To: <20010424132627.W1790@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010421195305.A19571@lerami.lerctr.org> <20010421175536.R1790@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010424133239.A33782@rtfm.net> <20010424.17525500@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> <20010424105818.P1790@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010424.20010500@ler-freebie.iadfw.net> <20010424132627.W1790@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I honestly don't know. I don't have the make output. The kernel=20 definition file has=20 NEVER had -O2, but /etc/make.conf DID. The current kernel is DEFINIATELY -O, not -O2.=20 LER >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 4/24/01, 3:26:27 PM, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote=20 regarding Re: kern/26224: > * Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> [010424 13:01] wrote: > > I'd like to wait 3 weeks to make sure (it's just been 2 days...). > > > > I know. One of my Committer dudes here had set it up that way, and = I > > figured he knew what he was doing......... > Well I used to compile kernel/world -O3, but then I realized I'd > rather not get paged at 3am because some box crapped on itself. :) > > > > But If I don't see that panic/hang again we can toast the PR (in 3-4= > > weeks.). > Well was the kernel compiled with -O2? If it was just userland it's > probably not fixed. > -- > -Alfred Perlstein - [alfred@freebsd.org] > Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"= > start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010424.20560500>