Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:55:03 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <15806.37687.91334.549008@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021029111603.GC4446@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200210241942.g9OJgGg6093678@bowie.private> <15800.21949.518746.273369@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021024183915.A89245@locore.ca> <20021029111603.GC4446@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien writes: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:39:15PM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > You can also get various new machines on sun.com for around $1000 USD, > > IIRC a 500mhz blade 100 does a buildworld in around 2-3 hours. > > A $1000 (new) 500 MHz blade running GENERIC (minus WITNESS) builds world > in a little under 3 hours. Or just a little slower than my 4 year old 500MHz 21264 (<$1000 used) alpha. Darn. I was hoping a reasonbly priced sparc64 would be fast enough that getting one would allow me to find LP64 problems quicker due to a faster buildworld cycle. It's really frustrating to get 2+ hours into a buildworld and have it die because of a problem in usr.sbin I guess we'll need to wait for x86-64 for that. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15806.37687.91334.549008>