From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 11:46:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EAFF6F; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A39C1813; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC820A45; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; h= content-type:to:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to; s= mesmtp; bh=mkT660NgTDYLF/wnWGO7lS7nz7o=; b=Eocc0BH2iUdXJo6CvX98I gmqWITB1SNRViYDHfnBGDI3roy6VXMs/L/kLiuV+n/4MbnRpWxOpuwrM41rcZ2HM oL0l+NfkzuZyod+Hrkbt8VQ++aeqwBWA1j522FgO3C4jvc58g9VvrDGBKBy4Lm9d XWNx9IALJLi69JfjbgJ2y4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:to:subject:references:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=mkT660NgTDYLF/wnWGO7lS7nz7o=; b=t2A5 eF1n9153NjDgDRSd3PFhZCrtotxxtn73BL9NJTkEXKv+yaBB3U80mGGizDdrn11B pr5u1Y05yUeug01XHYl3uI63lsS6lO4HfF0D/J94zMfEpUPdjWg1PgT2T7NHZ+qx GsWwWi6VGJAOKKsaJISwaC+hBxNDPiJZ55mQ1ds= X-Sasl-enc: OuIWAZofUgC6xcl9cBR4kS8Wr7ARvQByZcCNi44Z62bk 1373456772 Received: from tech304.office.supranet.net (unknown [66.170.8.18]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1A42E68021F; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:46:12 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Michael Grimm" Subject: Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5) References: <50D1C553.9060100@wasikowski.net> <20121220132750.GB99616@stack.nl> <50D4F2E4.7020600@wasikowski.net> <20121222171400.GA2399@anubis.morrow.me.uk> <50D5F296.9050109@wasikowski.net> <4476561A-43B6-4A7F-B0E9-EB40F7C1177C@odo.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:46:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Mark Felder" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:46:13 -0000 On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm wrote: > Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't > in stable yet. I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner than later. It's so painful when someone forgets to fix the alias numbering on servers with many, many IPv4 and IPv6 addresses...