From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Mar 28 15:13:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202DF6779D for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from v1.leiden.byshenk.net (v1.leiden.byshenk.net [37.97.209.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8425870A37 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: by v1.leiden.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id DC38375937; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:13:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:13:48 +0200 From: Gregory Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov Subject: Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ? Message-ID: <20180328151348.GP51114@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> References: <20180328130903.GC6612@zxy.spb.ru> <20180328133946.GN51114@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> <20180328143551.GD6612@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180328143551.GD6612@zxy.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:13:51 -0000 On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:35:51PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:39:46PM +0200, Gregory Byshenk wrote: > > > > Did you rebuild your virtualbox and nvidia modules for your new > > kernel? If you build a new kernel, then you need to rebuild any > > modules that were installed from ports for the new version. > > Only for -CURRENT, not for -STABLE: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2018-March/159649.html > > John Baldwin: "In theory we try to not break existing kernel > modules on a stable branch. That is, one should be able to kldload an > if_iwn.ko built on 11.0 on a 11-stable kernel." I understand that this is true for standard kernel modules, but I have frequently run into problems loading _ports_ modules on a new kernel - including in STABLE. -- gregory byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL