Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:07:44 -0800 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: Tom Rushworth <tom.b.rushworth@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/nut maintainer mail rejection Message-ID: <20240126010744.9CDC4389@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOaF7tMgiZ37s0vLsTtW1at92C-qpeo7kKtg%2BnutcREV92ECPg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOaF7tMgiZ37s0vLsTtW1at92C-qpeo7kKtg%2BnutcREV92ECPg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <CAOaF7tMgiZ37s0vLsTtW1at92C-qpeo7kKtg+nutcREV92ECPg@mail.gmail.c om> , Tom Rushworth writes: > Sorry for the noise folks, I'll keep this brief. My original ports > question is at the bottom. > > On 2024-01-25 15:37, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <CAOaF7tMr=uALOofsk-0d9QXGVMOTN=8CCeiDf5VF+OMu=ara1w@mail.gmail.c > om> > > The gmail address is the one I'm using to send to this list, and it > seems to work there. > I don't get it, but we probably shouldn't spend too much time on it. > > > The ports question that started all this: > > I'm hoping you are the right person for this question. You're listed as > the maintainer on both ports mentioned in the subject above. > > I've got an experimental NUT driver for an Alpha Technologies CFR1500RM > UPS. I doubt there are many of these old UPSes in use, but I was > planning to offer it to the NUT community anyways. I started the driver > directly from the NUT sources and only afterwards realized there was a > port (or ports). Since it still needs some work I'd like to set it up > as a patch I can apply to the ports tree locally so I can work on it in > sync with the FreeBSD ports system. > > Which port should I use - sysutils/nut or sysutils/nut-devel ? So far > the only changes needed are to drivers/Makefile.am and the actual new > driver source. I won't accept a patch for an experimental driver until a pull request to our upstream has been submitted first, then only to the -devel port. If they refuse to accept the patch, I will need to remove it from the port as well. Another option may be to add an option for an experimental driver from which we can fetch your sources from. You'd need to provide a URL. I'm not prepared to add the patch cart blanche because if it breaks I'm not prepared to diagnose and debug it for you. Preferred is an upstream pull request. Their URL is https://github.com/networkupstools/nut. BTW, I found the problematic postfix rule and have fixed it. Sorry about the bother. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e^(i*pi)+1=0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240126010744.9CDC4389>