From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 23 22:23:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B89FB2 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schmiedgen@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B6CD8FC18 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2012 22:23:04 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-042-125.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO gizeh.smoke) [88.72.42.125] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 24 Oct 2012 00:23:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3631242 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19j9ipcR41j5te44Or/0eLHlQ2eNI9NWRabhYDxxT 7ZNDAARjUQY4VH Message-ID: <508718C7.3040509@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:23:03 +0200 From: Michael Schmiedgen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121018 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Smeets Subject: Re: ZFS cache devs UNAVAIL References: <5085CF5E.5020500@gmx.net> <20121023022410.GA66994@over-yonder.net> <508651AF.20400@FreeBSD.org> <5086DA53.6030607@gmx.net> <5086F957.8010801@FreeBSD.org> <5086FCBF.4040902@FreeBSD.org> <508712B5.4060705@smeets.im> In-Reply-To: <508712B5.4060705@smeets.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 22:23:06 -0000 On 10/23/12 23:57, Florian Smeets wrote: > My NAS experienced same problem, I thought the old IDE SSD had just died > of old age, that's why i didn't investigate further yet. :) I got 2 physical SSDs, with both first partitions striped as cache for my main zpool (cache devs gone UNAVAIL) and both second partitions for a mirrored temp zpool (ONLINE). So I saw good chances to *not* blame the hardware. ;) > With the patch the cache device is back. Works here, too. Michael