From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 11 12:58:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA21442
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (schizo.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA21434
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 12:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mrcpu@localhost) by schizo.cdsnet.net (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA25258 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: port-supfile getting distfiles?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960611130120.23936K-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



I installed the 960606 snap.  When I run sup, on ports-supfile, I get
ports/distfiles *even* though ports-distfiles is commented out, and only
port-all is uncommented.

ports-all is documented as not containing distfiles.

So either supscan is doing something weird, or the docs are wrong.