From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Apr  6 11:09:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA23978
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 11:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA23973
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 11:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA03330; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 11:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ron Bolin <rlb@mindspring.com>
cc: FreeBSD Current Mailing List <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: CVSUP and Release Question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 06 Apr 1997 10:14:55 EDT."
             <3347AFDF.14D9@mindspring.com> 
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 1997 11:08:54 -0700
Message-ID: <3327.860350134@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I am using cvsup on tag=RELENG_2_2, but my build says 2.2-STABLE.

Joerg jumped the gun on calling it -stable, but now I don't want
to switch it back because there will end up being two sets of
people with "2.2-STABLE" in their uname line - the pre-stables and
the real-stables. :-)

I guess we'd just better hurry up and make it stable. :-)

In any case, you're grabbing the right tag if you're just trying
to stay up to date with 2.2.  If you grabbed RELENG_2_2_1_RELEASE
then you'd have the 2.2.1 release itself, but I don't see the
point?

					Jordan