Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 12:55:29 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUP Message-ID: <E0w9ynB-0005dB-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 1997 11:19:19 PST." <15004.859403959@time.cdrom.com> References: <15004.859403959@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <15004.859403959@time.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : > So sup is really really dead. What do people that want to get the stuff : > do who aren't running FreeBSD? Has cvsup been ported? : : Ported to... what? :-) Well, I did have OpenBSD in mind. Right now they update their copy of FreeBSD source tree with sup (they get the CVS tree). They are a little upset that sup has gone away w/o an announcement of that fact, but in an organization like this, that can't be helped. : And as we said before, sup is only as dead as its users want it to : be. There's nothing stopping another site from jumping up and deciding : to run a sup server for these bits. :-) That's true. I just wanna know what the most supported way is at the moment. I don't have a problem switching to something else as long as it has approx the same charactersitics as sup: relatively low latency, gets the whole tree, etc, etc. I'm thinking of actually moving it over to CTM since that is already ported to OpenBSD and I don't have to worry about porting a large Modula-3 runtime library. Before I do that, however, I'd like ot know what the best way to get the sources daily is so that in 3 months I'm not changing again. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0w9ynB-0005dB-00>