From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 21:05:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A5616A4CF for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:05:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BAE43D3F for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:05:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C78C37202 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:05:12 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: QkeHSzPMhuyUBp3L6VU49A 1099861510 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [80.41.97.122]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0725356D394 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:05:09 -0500 (EST) From: "R. W." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:05:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <418DBDC3.50805@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <418DBDC3.50805@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411072105.35320.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: 5.3 diskless PC & 2 NICs: Can I separate NFS from other network trafic? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 21:05:15 -0000 On Sunday 07 November 2004 06:16, Rob wrote: > Hello, > > I have a master for a cluster of diskless slaves; the master > serves the slaves over NFS (/, /usr, /home). I have two > internet cards in all PCs, but only using one on the slaves > right now. > > Could I use the second internet card to separate the NFS trafic > from all other network trafic? At the moment, I have this on a > slave: > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::2a0:b0ff:fe0e:3a95%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.123.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > 192.168.123.255 ether 00:a0:b0:0e:3a:95 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > rl1: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=8 > ether 00:50:fc:e9:30:49 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > The master is 192.168.123.254, which is also the router to this local > network (so the master has one NIC connected to the Internet, the > other to the switch of the local network). > > How can I utilize the dual NIC setup on the slaves in a optimal way? I'm not sure there is much point in separating NFS from other traffic, since they typically travel in opposite directions. For example a file download will involve packets coming into a client from the router and back out to the NFS server. Your NICs are full-duplex so the two types of traffic shouldn't get in each-others way very much.